Litcius/Paper detail

Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System

Linong Ji, Lixin Guo, Junqing Zhang, Yufeng Li, Zhiyan Chen

2021Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

This study reports a clinical evaluation of AiDEX CGM system featuring a 14-day sensor, real-time glucose monitoring and factory-calibration. A multicenter, prospective, masked clinical study was conducted at with a total of 120 participants. Each participant wore 4 studied sensors and had one in-clinic visit for venous blood reference tests. 40 out of the 120 participants wore additional Abbott Libre sensors and performed at least 7 capillary BG tests daily for additional reference and comparison. Continuous glucose error grid analysis (CG-EGA) showed that AiDEX and Abbott Libre had good agreement with venous blood glucose, with 98.69% and 98.96% accurate readings, respectively. Overall MARD of AiDEX CGM systems was 9.08% when compared to venous blood reference and 10.1% when compared to finger capillary BG reference.

Topics & Concepts

Continuous glucose monitoringBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringMedicineVenous bloodBlood glucose monitoringMulticenter studyContinuous monitoringDiabetes mellitusSurgeryInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialType 1 diabetesOperations managementEngineeringEndocrinologyDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System | Litcius