Comparing Self-Consistent <i>GW</i> and Vertex-Corrected <i>G</i><sub>0</sub><i>W</i><sub>0</sub> (<i>G</i><sub>0</sub><i>W</i><sub>0</sub>Γ) Accuracy for Molecular Ionization Potentials
Ming Wen, Vibin Abraham, Gaurav Harsha, Avijit Shee, K. Birgitta Whaley, Dominika Zgid
Abstract
We test the performance of self-consistent GW and several representative implementations of vertex-corrected G 0 W 0 ( G 0 W 0 Γ). These approaches are tested on benchmark data sets covering full valence spectra (first ionization potentials and some inner valence shell excitations). For small molecules, when comparing against state-of-the-art wave function techniques, our results show that full self-consistency in the GW scheme either systematically outperforms vertex-corrected G 0 W 0 or gives results of at least comparative quality. Moreover, G 0 W 0 Γ results in additional computational cost when compared to G 0 W 0 or self-consistent GW . The dependency of G 0 W 0 Γ on the starting mean-field solution is frequently more dominant than the magnitude of the vertex correction itself. Consequently, for molecular systems, self-consistent GW performed on the imaginary axis (and then followed by modern analytical continuation techniques) offers a more reliable approach to make predictions of ionization potentials.