Litcius/Paper detail

Time to Next Treatment in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Initiating First-Line Ibrutinib or Acalabrutinib

Ryan Jacobs, Xiaoxiao Lu, Bruno Émond, Laura Morrison, Frédéric Kinkead, Patrick Lefèbvre, Marie‐Hélène Lafeuille, Wasiulla Khan, Linda Wu, Zaina P. Qureshi, Moshe Levy

2023Future Oncology12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Aim: To investigate real-world time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line (1L) ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. Materials & methods: US specialty pharmacy electronic medical records (11/21/2018–4/30/2022) were used; patients initiated 1L on/after 11/21/2019 (acalabrutinib approval). Results: Among 710 patients receiving ibrutinib, 5.9% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 9.2 months); among 373 patients receiving acalabrutinib, 7.5% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 5.9 months). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, acalabrutinib-treated patients were 89% more likely to initiate next treatment (hazard ratio = 1.89; p = 0.016). Conclusion: This study addresses a need for real-world comparative effectiveness between 1L ibrutinib and acalabrutinib and shows that next treatment (a clinically meaningful measure for real-world progression) occurred less frequently with 1L ibrutinib.

Topics & Concepts

IbrutinibMedicineChronic lymphocytic leukemiaInternal medicineOncologyHazard ratioPharmacyLeukemiaConfidence intervalFamily medicineChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment