Litcius/Paper detail

Prevalence of Macular Atrophy in the MARINA Study of Ranibizumab versus Sham for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Barbara A. Blodi, Amitha Domalpally, Ellie Corkery, Aaron Osborne, Steve Blotner, Susanna M. Grzeschik, Shamika Gune

2023Ophthalmology Retina16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine prevalence, progression rates, and associations of newly detectable macular atrophy (MA) in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with/without ranibizumab treatment. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of MA in patients with occult/minimally classic nAMD who received monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 or 0.5 mg) or sham injections for 24 months (M) in MARINA, a phase III trial in treatment-naive patients (NCT00056836). PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred six patients with nAMD: ranibizumab 0.3 mg, n = 236; 0.5 mg, n = 237; sham, n = 233. METHODS: Macular atrophy, assessed by color fundus photographs/fluorescein angiography, was classified as "within," "adjacent," or "nonadjacent" to the original CNV lesion. Factors associated with MA were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence/incidence of newly detectable MA over time, association with CNV area, MA progression rate, association of MA with visual acuity (VA), changes in CNV/leakage area, and factors predictive of new MA at 24M. RESULTS: At 24M, new MA was detected in 36.8%, 40.4%, and 21.0% of eyes for ranibizumab 0.3 mg, 0.5 mg, and sham, respectively, most frequently within the area of the baseline CNV lesion (93.2%, 85.0%, and 69.0%). Rate of MA progression was similar across arms (∼ 0.3 to 0.4 mm/year). There was strong association between absence of fibrosis and detectable MA (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-5.56), whereas an association was not identified between detectable MA and baseline VA, baseline fellow eye atrophy, ranibizumab treatment, or change in leakage/CNV area at 24M. Ranibizumab-treated eyes gained VA with (0.3 mg: 5.3 letters [95% CI, -3.3, 13.8]; 0.5 mg: 9.8 [4.7-15.0]) or without new MA (0.3 mg: 6.4 [4.1-8.6]; 0.5 mg: 8.0 [5.3-10.6]), whereas VA in sham-treated eyes deteriorated with/without new MA (-14.7 [-23.6, -5.8] and -14.0 [-16.9, -11.1], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: New MA was more frequently detected in ranibizumab-treated than sham-treated eyes. Macular atrophy progression was similar across arms. Multivariate analysis showed that absence of fibrosis was the only variable associated with increased MA. Regardless of MA presence/location at baseline or throughout the study, ranibizumab-treated eyes showed clinically significant improvements in VA, whereas VA in sham-treated eyes worsened. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Topics & Concepts

RanibizumabMedicineMacular degenerationOphthalmologyChoroidal neovascularizationVisual acuityFluorescein angiographySurgeryBevacizumabChemotherapyRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Prevalence of Macular Atrophy in the MARINA Study of Ranibizumab versus Sham for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration | Litcius