Litcius/Paper detail

PEPR: Pseudo-Exhaustive Physically-Aware Region Testing

Wei Li, Chris Nigh, Danielle Duvalsaint, Subhasish Mitra, R. D. Blanton

202211 citationsDOI

Abstract

Recent reports indicate that existing fault models and test metrics result in substantial manufacturing test escapes that cause major system-level challenges such as silent data corruption resulting from incorrect computations. Such test escapes are often detected today after system deployment (e.g., in the field) using a variety of synthetic and application workloads. In this work, a new test metric is investigated for detecting defects that escape existing test approaches. PEPR (Pseudo-Exhaustive Physically-Aware Region) testing comprehensively analyzes both the physical layout and the logic netlist to identify single- or multi- output sub-circuits. The resulting sub-circuits are exhaustively tested to detect timing-independent combinational (TIC) defects. Analyses demonstrate that PEPR-based scan tests detect TIC defects perfectly (100%) when examining fail data from over 30,000 14nm failing chips. In contrast, existing fault models and test metrics might result in up to 95 % of TIC defects being detected fortuitously. Strategies for addressing increased test pattern count resulting from the pseudo-exhaustive nature of PEPR testing are also discussed.

Topics & Concepts

NetlistComputer scienceMetric (unit)Reliability engineeringTest (biology)Fault (geology)Field (mathematics)EngineeringEmbedded systemMathematicsPure mathematicsBiologyGeologyOperations managementSeismologyPaleontologyVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure AnalysisRadiation Effects in Electronics