Litcius/Paper detail

Outcome of Initial Progression During Nivolumab Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Should We Use iRECIST?

Dong Ho Lee, Sangyoun Hwang, Young Hwan Koh, Kyung-Hun Lee, Ju Yeon Kim, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung‐Hwan Yoon, Jeong‐Hoon Lee, Joong-Won Park

2021Frontiers in Medicine20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (iRECIST) is recommended during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment, due to the possibility of pseudoprogression. We evaluated the frequency of pseudoprogression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This retrospective multicenter study involved 158 consecutive patients who underwent nivolumab treatment for HCC in Korea. At the initial evaluation, 94 patients presented with immune unconfirmed progressive disease, and 22 continued nivolumab. At the second evaluation, 21 of the 22 patients (95.5%) had confirmed progression and no pseudoprogression was observed. Considering low possibility of pseudoprogression, iRECIST may not be required for HCC.

Topics & Concepts

NivolumabMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaOncologyInternal medicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsImmunotherapyGastroenterologyProgressive diseaseDiseaseCancerCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Outcome of Initial Progression During Nivolumab Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Should We Use iRECIST? | Litcius