Litcius/Paper detail

Governing in a Polarized Era: Federalism and the Response of U.S. State and Federal Governments to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Thomas A. Birkland, Kristin Taylor, Deserai A. Crow, Rob A. DeLeo

2021Publius The Journal of Federalism60 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract How does the state of American federalism explain responses to COVID-19? State-by-state variations to the COVID-19 pandemic illustrate the political dynamics of “kaleidoscopic federalism,” under which there is no single prevailing principle of federalism. In the COVID-19 pandemic, features of kaleidoscopic federalism combined with shortcomings in the public health system under the Trump administration, leading to fragmented responses to the pandemic among the states. Federalism alone does not explain the shortcomings of the United States’ response to the pandemic. Rather, the fragmented response was driven by state partisanship, which shaped state public health interventions and resulted in differences in public health outcomes. This has sobering implications for American federalism because state-level partisan differences yield different and unequal responses to the pandemic.

Topics & Concepts

FederalismPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)State (computer science)Political sciencePoliticsPublic healthPolitical economyPublic administrationSociologyLawMedicineAlgorithmInfectious disease (medical specialty)Computer scienceDiseasePathologyNursingPublic Health Policies and EducationPolicy Transfer and LearningGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology