Litcius/Paper detail

Mathematical Responses to the Hole Argument: Then and Now

Clara Bradley, James Owen Weatherall

2022Philosophy of Science31 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract We argue that several apparently distinct responses to the hole argument, all invoking formal or mathematical considerations, should be viewed as a unified “mathematical response.” We then consider and rebut two prominent critiques of the mathematical response before reflecting on what is ultimately at issue in this literature.

Topics & Concepts

Argument (complex analysis)EpistemologyMathematical modelMathematical theoryMathematical practiceComputer scienceFormal descriptionMathematical economicsCalculus (dental)MathematicsPhilosophyPhysicsBiologyQuantum mechanicsBiochemistryStatisticsDentistryMedicineProgramming languageHistory and Theory of MathematicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Mathematical Responses to the Hole Argument: Then and Now | Litcius