Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of Four DNA Extraction Kits Efficiency for 16SrDNA Microbiota Profiling of Diverse Human Samples

Sandrine Le Gall‐David, Gaëlle Boudry, Sylvie Buffet‐Bataillon

2023Future Science OA12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Aim: The current study investigated the performance of 4 widely used DNA extraction kits using different types of high (stool) and low biomass samples (chyme, broncho alveolar lavage and sputum). Methods: Qiagen Powerfecal Pro DNA kit, Macherey Nucleospin Soil kit, Macherey Nucleospin Tissue Kit and MagnaPure LC DNA isolation kit III were evaluated in terms of DNA quantity, quality, diversity and composition profiles. Results: The quantity and quality of DNA varied among the four kits. The microbiota of the stool samples showed similar diversity and compositional profiles for the 4 kits. Conclusion: Despite differences in DNA quality and quantity, the 4 kits yielded similar results for stool samples, while all kits were not sensitive enough for low biomass samples.

Topics & Concepts

Profiling (computer programming)Computational biologyDNADNA extractionDNA profilingChemistryBiologyGeneticsPolymerase chain reactionComputer scienceGeneOperating systemForensic and Genetic ResearchMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Comparison of Four DNA Extraction Kits Efficiency for 16SrDNA Microbiota Profiling of Diverse Human Samples | Litcius