Litcius/Paper detail

In Vitro Mastication Simulation and Wear Test of Virgilite and Advanced Lithium Disilicate Ceramics

Martin Rosentritt, Alois Schmid, Christina Huber, Thomas Strasser

2022The International Journal of Prosthodontics31 citationsDOI

Abstract

Martin Rosentritt, PhD/Alois Schmid, DDS/Christina Huber, DDS/Thomas Strasser, DDS: Purpose: To compare wear behavior, durability during in vitro mastication simulation, and fracture force of an established and a novel lithium disilicate CAD/CAM material, as well as to examine the impact of cementation and reduced ceramic thickness on durability and fracture force. Materials and Methods: Specimens (n = 8 per group) were prepared from lithium disilicate (LS2; IPS e.max, Ivoclar Vivadent) and advanced lithium disilicate (ALD; Cerec Tessera, Dentsply Sirona). Specimens were polished, and two-body wear test and thermocycling were performed (50 N, 120,000 cycles, 1.6 Hz, H<sub>2</sub>O dist., 5ºC/55ºC, 600 cycles). Maximum vertical loss, surface roughness, surface roughness depth, and antagonist wear were determined. Single crowns (n = 8 per group; thickness 1.5 mm/1.0 mm) were manufactured from LS2 and ALD and mounted on human molar teeth with adhesive resin (AB; CalibraCeram, Dentsply Sirona), glass-ionomer cement (GIC; Ketac Cem, 3M ESPE), and hybrid glass-ionomer cement (HGIC; Calibra Bio, Dentsply Sirona). Thermocycling and mechanical loading (2 × 3000 × 5ºC/55ºC, 2 minutes, H20 dist., 1.2 × 10<sub>6</sub> 50 N) were performed. Fracture force was determined by a universal testing machine (1446, ZwickRoell), and one-way analysis and Bonferroni post hoc test (α = .05) were used for statistical analyses. Results: Mean (ALD: 210 à } 42.4 μm; LS<sub>2</sub>: 264.3 ± 56.1 μm) and maximum (ALD: 391.1 ± 86.3 μm; LS<sub>2</sub>: 518.3 ± 113.2 μm) wear between groups were significantly different (P ≤ .047). Fracture force varied between 1,911.4 ± 468.4 N (ALD/AB 1 mm) and 2,995.3 ± 880.6 N (LS<sub>2</sub>/GIC), without significant differences (P ≥ .152). Conclusion: ALD showed better wear behavior than LS<sub>2</sub>, but provided similar fracture force. Cementation and reduction of ceramic thickness had only minor effects on fracture force.

Topics & Concepts

Materials scienceComposite materialUniversal testing machineCeramicGlass ionomer cementMolarCementation (geology)Chamfer (geometry)DentistryCementUltimate tensile strengthMathematicsMedicineGeometryDental materials and restorationsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes