Litcius/Paper detail

COVID-19: Criminal Law, Public Assemblies and Human Rights Litigation.

Ian Freckelton

2020PubMed24 citations

Abstract

Australia's criminal law was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic from the outset and then progressively as statutory measures and judicial rulings on matters such as bail entitlements, judge-alone trials, sentences and applications for demonstrations and public assemblies were made by courts. This column identifies some of the major decisions made during the period of the lockdown measures between March and July 2020, and reviews significant New South Wales judgments in relation to the lawfulness of mass gatherings during the period of lockdown as expert assessments of risks of community transmission of the virus waxed and waned. It explores the importation into Australia's criminal law of public health principles for the protection of the community, and its compatibility with traditional principles of criminal justice.

Topics & Concepts

Statutory lawLawPolitical sciencePandemicCriminal lawHuman rightsCriminal justicePublic healthPublic lawCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)MedicineDiseaseNursingPathologyMedical Malpractice and Liability IssuesCriminal Law and EvidenceLegal Education and Practice Innovations
COVID-19: Criminal Law, Public Assemblies and Human Rights Litigation. | Litcius