Litcius/Paper detail

Left bundle branch area pacing vs right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: the MELOS RELOADED study

Marek Jastrzębski, Grzegorz Kiełbasa, Óscar Cano, Karol Čurila, Francesco Zanon, Cătălin Pestrea, Jan De Pooter, Justin Luermans, Leonard M. Rademakers, David Žižek, Domenico Grieco, Wim Huybrechts, Philipp Krisai, Zachary I. Whinnett, P. Moskal, Valérian Valiton, Javier Navarrete‐Navarro, Petr Štros, Francesco Deluca, Ecaterina Cicală, Emine Özpak, Kevin Vernooy, Haran Burri

2025European Heart Journal22 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) promotes physiological synchronous activation of the left ventricle and may be particularly beneficial in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB), but its mortality benefit remains unclear. This study aims to compare long-term survival in AVB patients receiving either LBBAP or right ventricular pacing (RVP) and to analyse predictors of mortality during LBBAP. METHODS: MELOS RELOADED, a multicentre European collaboration, was a registry-based study of pacemaker patients with AVB, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and ventricular pacing >20%. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality based on national registries. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between the RVP and LBBAP groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate survival. RESULTS: In total, 3382 patients receiving LBBAP or RVP were matched. At 4-year follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier curve showed an absolute difference in survival of 11.8% in favour of LBBAP (P < .001). LBBAP was a robust predictor of reduced mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.42-0.65, P < .001). Within the LBBAP group, the following independent predictors of increased mortality were identified: lack of confirmed left bundle branch capture (HR 1.85, P < .001), lower percentage of ventricular pacing (HR 1.12), and age. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large study demonstrating the long-term survival benefit of LBBAP. This strengthens the use of LBBAP in AVB patients with preserved/mildly reduced LVEF while awaiting the results of randomized trials. Confirmation of left bundle branch capture seems advisable to achieve optimal results with LBBAP.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineCardiologyInternal medicineVentricular pacingBundleEjection fractionLeft bundle branch blockBundle branchesCardiac resynchronization therapyCardiac pacingBundle of HisElectrical conduction system of the heartAtrioventricular blockElectrocardiographyVentricular functionHeart failureCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Left bundle branch area pacing vs right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: the MELOS RELOADED study | Litcius