Litcius/Paper detail

Conversion between Vickers hardness and nanohardness by correcting projected area with sink-in and pile-up effects

Youping Lu, Yue Su, Wei Ge, Tengfei Yang, Zhanfeng Yan, Yugang Wang, Songqin Xia

2020Plasma Science and Technology20 citationsDOI

Abstract

The Vickers hardness test has been widely used for neutron-irradiated materials and nanoindentation for ion-irradiated materials. Comparing the Vickers hardness and nanohardness of the same materials quantitatively and establishing a correlation between them is meaningful. In this study, five representative materials—pure titanium (Ti), nickel (Ni), tungsten (W), 304 coarse-grained stainless steel (CG-SS) and 304 nanocrystalline austenitic stainless steel (NG-SS)—are investigated for comparison. The results show that the relationship between Vickers hardness and nanohardness does not conform to a mathematical geometric relationship because of sink-in and pile-up effects confirmed by finite element analysis (FEA) and the results of optical microscopy. Finally, one new method was developed by excluding the effects of sink-in and pile-up in materials. With this improved correction in the projected area of the Vickers hardness and nanohardness, the two kinds of hardness become identical.

Topics & Concepts

Vickers hardness testNanoindentationMaterials scienceMetallurgyIndentation hardnessNickelComposite materialMicrostructureMetal and Thin Film MechanicsFusion materials and technologiesAdvanced materials and composites
Conversion between Vickers hardness and nanohardness by correcting projected area with sink-in and pile-up effects | Litcius