Racial effects on Masimo pulse oximetry: a laboratory study
Steven J. Barker, William C. Wilson
Abstract
Abstract Recent publications have suggested that pulse oximeters exhibit reduced accuracy in dark-skinned patients during periods of hypoxemia. Masimo SET® (Signal Extraction Technology®) has been designed, calibrated, and validated using nearly equal numbers of dark and light skinned subjects, with the goal of eliminating differences between pulse oximetry saturation (SpO 2 ) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO 2 ) values due to skin pigmentation. The accuracy concerns reported in dark-skinned patients led us to perform a retrospective analysis of healthy Black and White volunteers. Seventy-five subjects who self-identified as being racially Black or White underwent a desaturation protocol where SaO 2 values were decreased from 100 to 70%, while simultaneous SpO 2 values were recorded using Masimo RD SET® sensors. Statistical bias (mean difference) and precision (standard deviation of difference) were − 0.20 ± 1.40% for Black and − 0.05 ± 1.35% for White subjects. Plots of SpO 2 versus SaO 2 show no significant visible differences between races throughout the saturation range from 70 to 100%. Box plots grouped in 1% saturation bins, from 89–96%, and plotted against concomitant SaO 2 values, show that occult hypoxemia (SaO 2 < 88% when SpO 2 = 92–96%) occurred in only 0.2% of White subject data pairs, but not in any Black subjects. There were no clinically significant differences in bias (mean difference of SpO 2 -SaO 2 ) found between healthy Black and White subjects. Occult hypoxemia was rare and did not occur in Black subjects. Masimo RD SET® can be used with equal assurance in people with dark or light skin. These laboratory results were obtained in well-controlled experimental conditions in healthy volunteers—not reflecting actual clinical conditions/patients.