Elevated Serum Lactate in Patients With Lymphoma: It Is Not Always Infection
Gordon Ruan, Sangeetha Gandhi, Jithma P. Abeykoon, Susan Schram, Thomas M. Habermann, Benjamin J. Sandefur, Thomas E. Witzig
Abstract
ObjectiveTo distinguish between sepsis only vs progressive lymphoma in patients with a history of lymphoma who present to the hospital with lactic acidosis.Patients and MethodsWe identified patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma from January 2014 to December 2015. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: sepsis only or progressive lymphoma. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ2Kraut J.A. Madias N.E. Lactic acidosis.N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 2309-2319Crossref PubMed Scopus (376) Google Scholar/Fisher exact test were used to compare the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 51 patients were identified; 33 (65%) patients were categorized into the sepsis only group, and 18 (35%), into the progressive lymphoma group. Values for serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) drawn during hospitalization were statistically different between the sepsis only and progressive lymphoma groups (median, 262 vs 665 U/L; P=.005), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of serum LDH level 2 or more times the upper limit of normal for progressive lymphoma were 56% (95% CI, 33% to 79%) and 85% (95% CI, 73% to 97%), respectively. Serum LDH level was independently predictive of inferior OS (hazard ratio, 27.8; 95% CI, 4.0 to 160.1; P<.001), while serum albumin level (hazard ratio, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.27; P<.001) was independently predictive of improved OS.ConclusionSerum LDH levels used in conjunction with serial serum lactate values may be reliable markers to differentiate patients with progressive lymphomatous disease from patients with lymphoma with sepsis only. The LDH levels should be obtained in all patients with lymphoma who present to the hospital with lactic acidosis.