Litcius/Paper detail

Subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP Compared With Subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP Plus Lenalidomide in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma for Patients Age 80 Years or Older

Lucie Obéric, Frédéric Peyrade, Mathieu Puyade, Christophe Bonnet, Peggy Dartigues-Cuillères, Bettina Fabiani, Philippe Ruminy, Hervé Maisonneuve, Julie Abraham, Catherine Thiéblemont, Pierre Feugier, Gilles Salles, Fontanet Bijou, Gian-Matteo Pica, Gandhi Damaj, Corinne Haïoun, Olivier Casasnovas, H. Farhat, Ronan Le Calloch, Agathe Waultier‐Rascalou, Sandra Malak, Jérôme Paget, Elodie Gat, Hervé Tilly, Fabrice Jardin

2021Journal of Clinical Oncology73 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognosis of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is worse than that of young patients. An attenuated dose of chemotherapy—cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R-miniCHOP)—is a good compromise between efficacy and safety in very elderly patients. In combination with R-CHOP (R2-CHOP), lenalidomide has an acceptable level of toxicity and may mitigate the negative prognosis of the non–germinal center B-cell–like phenotype. The Lymphoma Study association conducted a multicentric, phase III, open-label, randomized trial to compare R-miniCHOP and R2-miniCHOP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients of age 80 years or older with untreated DLBCL were randomly assigned into the R-miniCHOP21 group or the R2-miniCHOP21 group for six cycles and stratified according to CD10 expression and age. The first cycle of rituximab was delivered by IV on D1 after a prephase and then delivered subcutaneously on D1 of cycles 2-6. Lenalidomide was delivered at a dose of 10 mg once daily on D1-D14 of each cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 249 patients with new DLBCL were randomly assigned (127 R-miniCHOP and 122 R2-miniCHOP). The median age was 83 years (range, 80-96), and 55% of the patients were classified as non-GCB. The delivered dose for each R-miniCHOP compound was similar in both arms. Over a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed that R2-miniCHOP did not improve OS (2-year OS 66% in R-miniCHOP and 65.7% in R2-miniCHOP arm, P = .98) in the overall population or in the non-GCB population. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 53% of patients with R-miniCHOP and in 81% of patients with R2-miniCHOP. CONCLUSION: The addition of lenalidomide to R-miniCHOP does not improve OS. Rituximab delivered subcutaneously was safe in this population.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineRituximabLenalidomideVincristineDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaInternal medicinePrednisoneCyclophosphamideCHOPGastroenterologyClinical endpointLymphomaSurgeryChemotherapyOncologyRandomized controlled trialMultiple myelomaLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP Compared With Subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP Plus Lenalidomide in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma for Patients Age 80 Years or Older | Litcius