Litcius/Paper detail

The Ethical Significance of Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics

Steven R. Kraaijeveld

2022Journal of Bioethical Inquiry12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination policy and ethics. In this paper, I discuss recent evidence that the current COVID-19 vaccines have only a modest and short-lived effect on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and argue that this has at least four important ethical implications. First, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 should be seen primarily as a self-protective choice for individuals. Second, moral condemnation of unvaccinated people for causing direct harm to others is unjustified. Third, the case for a harm-based moral obligation to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is weak. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, coercive COVID-19 vaccination policies (e.g., measures that exclude unvaccinated people from society) cannot be directly justified by the harm principle.

Topics & Concepts

HarmVaccinationPhilosophy of medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Medical lawMoral obligationObligationTransmission (telecommunications)PandemicMedicinePolitical scienceLaw and economicsVirologyLawInfectious disease (medical specialty)SociologyDiseaseAlternative medicineElectrical engineeringEngineeringPathologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentVaccine Coverage and HesitancySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
The Ethical Significance of Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics | Litcius