A systematic review of justice integration to climate resilience: Current trends and future directions
Virginia Pellerey, Sara Torabi Moghadam, Patrizia Lombardi
Abstract
Climate resilience has been adopted as a systematic approach for facing climate change. Although the concept of resilience received criticism for failing to address the issues of power imbalance and conservatism, recent approaches include diverse justice perspectives as pathways to address these concerns. However, the lack of clarity regarding the diverse definitions of justice and their relationship to climate resilience hinders our understanding of how to effectively integrate urban climate resilience and justice. This study offers a systematic review of literature on justice and climate resilience in the urban context with the intent of (i) identifying articles addressing justice and climate resilience and classifying them according to the form of justice and resilience framing, (ii) studying trends in the current literature, (iii) identifying research gaps, and (iv) reflecting on the possibility for integration between justice and resilience in different phases of the resilience-building process and proposing future insights. In particular, the results emphasize the importance of (1) enhancing system thinking using people-centered approaches, (2) focusing on the social implications of climate actions, and (3) evaluating different timeframes. The study concludes by suggesting policymaking and research strategies for facilitating the transition toward just and climate-resilient cities. • Urban climate resilience requires the integration of different forms of justice. • Current studies emphasize unequal distribution of outcomes or procedural obstacles. • Existing literature lacks focus on retributive, restorative, and future-oriented approaches. • Strategies to incorporate diverse forms of justice and resilience framings are suggested.