Quantifying the relationship linking the community‐weighted means of plant traits and soil fertility
Laurent Daou, Éric Garnier, Bill Shipley
Abstract
Abstract Is it possible to generalize relationships between certain plant traits and soil fertility? In particular, are there quantitative relationships between community‐weighted mean (CWM) trait values of leaf dry‐matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), plant height, and Grime’s competitor‐stress tolerator‐ruderal (CSR) strategy scores and the generalized soil fertility, F G (i.e., the capacity of a soil to produce biomass when all nonsoil variables are held constant) that are generalizable across different species assemblages and geographical areas? We assessed F G in 21 sites in southern Quebec and 7 sites in southern France using a previously published method based on structural equation modeling. We then determined the CWM values of LDMC, SLA, plant height, and CSR scores in the 21 Quebec sites to obtain quantitative relationships between F G and these CWM traits. Using these relationships, we independently tested the generality of the trait–fertility relationships using data from French sites. The relationships between F G and the CWM traits were nonlinear, but displayed the expected qualitative trends as reported in the literature. In particular, the S score and CWM LDMC decreased with increasing soil fertility, and the R score and CWM SLA increased. CWM traits were more strongly correlated to measures of F G ( r 2 up to 0.48) than to measures of other soil characteristics ( r 2 up to 0.17 for nitrogen flux). Importantly, the independently tested French F G –trait relationships showed no significant deviations from these quantitative relationships. Further investigation is necessary to confirm if the same trend applies to other regions and or ecosystems.