Meta‐Analysis Comparing Oral Anticoagulant Monotherapy Versus Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Mushood Ahmed, Areeba Ahsan, Aimen Shafiq, Raheel Ahmed, Mahboob Alam, Pierre Sabouret, Jamal S. Rana, Gregg C. Fonarow
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are routinely used for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) while antiplatelet agents are used in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data regarding the comparative clinical outcomes of OAC monotherapy versus dual antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulant plus antiplatelet agent) in patients with AF and stable CAD are limited. METHODS: A comprehensive search of major databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed from inception to September 1, 2024 to identify randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared OAC monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF and stable CAD. The risk ratios (RRs) were estimated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes. RESULTS: A total of three RCTs reported data for 3945 patients with AF and stable CAD. The mean age of patients was 73.8 (±11.85) years and the mean follow-up was 22 months. OAC monotherapy was associated with a significantly reduced relative risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.95) compared to dual therapy. The risk of all-cause death (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.49-1.48), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.50-1.41), any stroke event (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.46-1.18), and myocardial infarction (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.79-3.12) remained comparable across the two groups. CONCLUSION: OAC monotherapy led to a significant relative risk reduction for major bleeding with similar rates of ischemic events and mortality compared to dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF and stable CAD.