Drug Survival of Adalimumab, Secukinumab, and Ustekinumab in Psoriasis as Determined by Either Dose Escalation or Drug Discontinuation during the First 3 Years of Treatment – a Nationwide Cohort Study
David Thein, Nana Aviaaja Lippert Rosenø, Julia‐Tatjana Maul, Jashin J. Wu, Lone Skov, Lars Erik Bryld, Mads K. Rasmussen, Kawa Khaled Ajgeiy, Simon Francis Thomsen, Jacob P. Thyssen, Alexander Egeberg
Abstract
The real-world efficacy of biologics may be insufficiently assessed through common drug survival studies. The objective was thus to examine the real-world performance of biologics in the treatment of psoriasis using the composite endpoint of either discontinuation or off-label dose escalation. Using a prospective nationwide registry (DERMBIO, 2007-2019), we included patients with psoriasis treated with adalimumab, secukinumab, and/or ustekinumab, which have all been used as first-line therapy during the inclusion period. The primary endpoint was a composite of either off-label dose escalation or discontinuation of treatment, whereas the secondary outcomes were dose escalation and discontinuation, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the presentation of unadjusted drug survival curves. Cox-regression models were used for risk assessment. In 4,313 treatment series (38.8% women, mean age 46.0 years, and 58.3% bio-naivety), we found that the risk of the composite endpoint was lower for secukinumab when compared with ustekinumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.76), but higher for adalimumab (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26). However, the risk of discontinuation was higher for secukinumab (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42) and adalimumab (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.82-2.22). For bio-naive patients treated with secukinumab, the risk of discontinuation was comparable to that of ustekinumab (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.61-1.49).