How to Be a More Effective Reviewer
David M. Schultz
Abstract
Monthly Weather Review needs over a thousand peer reviews each year to maintain the high quality of articles that our readership have come to expect. We value our volunteer reviewers and recognize their investment that keeps our journal operating. As a result of their experience, professionalism, and generosity, the majority of these thousand reviews are thoughtful, thorough, and constructive. I hear about the negativity in peer review in journals from other disciplines, and I am thankful that we rarely see such serious issues in Monthly Weather Review.
Topics & Concepts
ReuseComputer scienceEngineeringWaste managementMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsClimate variability and modelsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds