Litcius/Paper detail

Machine learning interatomic potential can infer electrical response

Peichen Zhong, Dongjin Kim, Daniel S. King, Bingqing Cheng

2025npj Computational Materials11 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Modeling the response of material and chemical systems to electric fields remains a longstanding challenge. Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) offer an efficient and scalable alternative to quantum mechanical methods, but do not by themselves incorporate electrical response. Here, we show that polarization and Born effective charge (BEC) tensors can be directly extracted from long-range MLIPs within the Latent Ewald Summation (LES) framework, solely by learning from energy and force data. Using this approach, we predict the infrared spectra of bulk water under zero or finite external electric fields, ionic conductivities of high-pressure superionic ice, and the phase transition and hysteresis in ferroelectric PbTiO 3 perovskite. This work thus extends the capability of MLIPs to predict electrical response –without training on charges or polarization or BECs– and enables accurate modeling of electric-field-driven processes in diverse systems at scale.

Topics & Concepts

FerroelectricityPolarization (electrochemistry)Statistical physicsInteratomic potentialHysteresisPhase transitionElectric potential energyElectrostaticsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsComputer scienceCharge (physics)Work (physics)Machine learningMaterials scienceScalabilityElectric fieldInduced polarizationArtificial intelligencePolarization densityPhase (matter)Electric potentialRandom phase approximationMultiscale modelingEnergy (signal processing)Ionic bondingComputational physicsQuantumElectric chargeVoltageMachine Learning in Materials ScienceInorganic Chemistry and MaterialsElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides