Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiographic derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Sara Gaur, Timothy Fairbairn, Pamela S. Douglas, Jesper Møller Jensen, Manesh R. Patel, Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid, Brian Ko, Stephanie Sellers, Jonathan Weir‐McCall, Hitoshi Matsuo, Niels Peter Rønnow Sand, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Campbell Rogers, Sarah Mullen, Koen Nieman, Erik Thorlund Parner, Jonathon Leipsic, Jawdat Abdulla
Abstract
Objectives To obtain more powerful assessment of the prognostic value of fractional flow reserve CT testing we performed a systematic literature review and collaborative meta-analysis of studies that assessed clinical outcomes of CT-derived calculation of FFR (FFR CT ) (HeartFlow) analysis in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods We searched PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases for published studies that evaluated clinical outcomes following fractional flow reserve CT testing between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. The primary endpoint was defined as ‘all-cause mortality (ACM) or myocardial infarction (MI)’ at 12-month follow-up. Exploratory analyses were performed using major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, ACM+MI+unplanned revascularisation), ACM, MI, spontaneous MI or unplanned (>3 months) revascularisation as the endpoint. Results Five studies were identified including a total of 5460 patients eligible for meta-analyses. The primary endpoint occurred in 60 (1.1%) patients, 0.6% (13/2126) with FFR CT >0.80% and 1.4% (47/3334) with FFR CT ≤0.80 (relative risk (RR) 2.31 (95% CI 1.29 to 4.13), p=0.005). Likewise, MACE, MI, spontaneous MI or unplanned revascularisation occurred more frequently in patients with FFR CT ≤0.80 versus patients with FFR CT >0.80. Each 0.10-unit FFR CT reduction was associated with a greater risk of the primary endpoint (RR 1.67 (95% CI 1.47 to 1.87), p<0.001). Conclusions The 12-month outcomes in patients with stable CAD show low rates of events in those with a negative FFR CT result, and lower risk of an unfavourable outcome in patients with a negative test result compared with patients with a positive test result. Moreover, the FFR CT numerical value was inversely associated with outcomes.