Litcius/Paper detail

Cumulative 5-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Biological Mesh With Primary Perineal Wound Closure After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection (BIOPEX-study)

Robin D. Blok, Sarah Sharabiany, Jaap Stoker, Ellen T. M. Laan, Robbert J. I. Bosker, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Sanjay Chaudhri, Peter van Duijvendijk, Boudewijn van Etten, Anna A. W. van Geloven, Eelco J. R. de Graaf, Christiaan Hoff, Roel Hompes, Jeroen W. A. Leijtens, Joost Rothbarth, Harm J. T. Rutten, Baljit Singh, Ronald J. C. L. M. Vuylsteke, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Willem A. Bemelman, Gijsbert D. Musters, Pieter J. Tanis

2021Annals of Surgery33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term outcomes of a randomized trial (BIOPEX) comparing biological mesh and primary perineal closure in rectal cancer patients after extralevator abdominoperineal resection and preoperative radiotherapy, with a primary focus on symptomatic perineal hernia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: BIOPEX is the only randomized trial in this field, which was negative on its primary endpoint (30-day wound healing). METHODS: This was a posthoc secondary analysis of patients randomized in the BIOPEX trial to either biological mesh closure (n = 50; 2 dropouts) or primary perineal closure (n = 54; 1 dropout). Patients were followed for 5 years. Actuarial 5-year probabilities were determined by the Kaplan-Meier statistic. RESULTS: Actuarial 5-year symptomatic perineal hernia rates were 7% (95% CI, 0-30) after biological mesh closure versus 30% (95% CI, 10-49) after primary closure (P = 0.006). One patient (2%) in the biomesh group underwent elective perineal hernia repair, compared to 7 patients (13%) in the primary closure group (P = 0.062). Reoperations for small bowel obstruction were necessary in 1/48 patients (2%) and 5/53 patients (9%), respectively (P = 0.208). No significant differences were found for chronic perineal wound problems, locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and main domains of quality of life and functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic perineal hernia rate at 5-year follow-up after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer was significantly lower after biological mesh closure. Biological mesh closure did not improve quality of life or functional outcomes.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineSurgeryRandomized controlled trialAbdominoperineal resectionPerineumClosure (psychology)Surgical meshQuality of life (healthcare)Wound closureHerniaResectionRectumColorectal cancerClinical trialVentral herniaHernia repair and managementPelvic floor disorders treatmentsAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes