Litcius/Paper detail

Clinical Characteristics of an Italian Patient Population with Advanced BCC and Real-Life Evaluation of Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor Safety and Effectiveness

Maria Mannino, Alfredo Piccerillo, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Pietro Quaglino, Giuseppe Argenziano, Emi Dika, Paolo A. Ascierto, Giovanni Pellacani, Caterina Longo, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Luca Bianchi, Piergiacomo Calzavara‐Pinton, Iris Zalaudek, Paolo Fava, Massimiliano Scalvenzi, Enrico Bocchino, Alessandro Di Stefani, Ketty Peris, and Collaborators

2023Dermatology15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) represents a complex and clinically heterogeneous group of lesions for which curative surgery and/or radiotherapy is unlikely. Systemic therapy with hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) changed the treatment landscape for this complex patient population. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study are to describe the clinical characteristics of a real-life Italian cohort diagnosed with aBCC and to investigate effectiveness and safety of HHI. METHODS: A multicenter observational study was performed by twelve Italian centers in the period January 1, 2016 - October 15, 2022. Patients aged ≥18 years and diagnosed with aBCC (locally advanced [laBCC] and metastatic BCC [mBCC]) were eligible for the study. Methods for investigating tumor response to HHI included clinical and dermatoscopic evaluation, radiological imaging, and histopathology. For HHI safety assessment, therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were reported and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: We enrolled 178 patients under treatment with HHI: 126 (70.8%) and 52 patients (29.2%) received sonidegib and vismodegib, respectively. Comprehensive data on HHI effectiveness and disease outcome were available for 132 (74.1%) of 178 patients: 129 patients had a diagnosis of laBCC (n = 84, sonidegib; n = 45, vismodegib) and 3 patients of mBCC (n = 2, vismodegib; n = 1, sonidegib, off-label). Objective response rate was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3-68.7) and 33.3% (95% CI: 88.2-1.7) for laBCC (complete response [CR]: 43/129; PR: 56/129) and mBCC (CR: 0/3; PR: 1/3), respectively. High-risk aBCC histopathological subtypes and occurrence of >2 therapy-related AEs were significantly associated with nonresponse to HHI therapy ([OR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.09-6.05; p: 0.03] and [OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.03-7.9; p: 0.04]), respectively. Majority of our cohort (54.5%) developed at least 1 therapy-related AE, most of which were mild-moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness and safety profile of HHI and confirm the reproducibility of pivotal trial results in real-life clinical setting.

Topics & Concepts

VismodegibMedicineBasal cell carcinomaCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsInternal medicineAdverse effectHazard ratioObservational studyRadiation therapyConfidence intervalOncologySurgeryBasal cellHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management