Cardiothoracic surgeons in pandemics: Ethical considerations
Daniel H. Drake, Cynthia D. Morrow, Kathleen Kinlaw, Michele De Bonis, Alberto Zangrillo, Robert M. Sade, David Blitzer, Andrea J. Carpenter, DuyKhanh P. Ceppa, Edward P. Chen, Robbin G. Cohen, Thomas A. D’Amico, Daniel H. Drake, John W. Entwistle, Paul W.M. Fedak, Kathleen N. Fenton, Matthias Loebe, John E. Mayer, Martin F. McKneally, Walter H. Merrill, Scott J. Millikan, Susan D. Moffatt‐Bruce, Sudish C. Murthy, Keith S. Naunheim, Mark B. Orringer, Allan Pickens, Shuddhadeb Ray, Jennifer C. Romano, Robert M. Sade, Sandra L. Starnes, Julie A. Swain, James S. Tweddell, Richard I. Whyte, Douglas D. Wood, Joseph B. Zwischenberger
Abstract
During a pandemic the primary responsibility of community, government, and health care systems is to isolate the disease and slow transmission. Stopping or slowing the spread of disease decreases the number of individuals exposed and mitigates the surge of critically ill patients into health care systems. Concomitantly health care systems should prepare for the surge predicted by public health authorities and expand capacity. 1,2 If, despite maximum expansion, the surge is overwhelming, essential resources become scarce. Proactive resource allocation should reduce mortality and life-years lost for individuals and society as a whole. This document is intended to provide cardiothoracic surgeons with a guide to identifying and responding to ethical issues related to pandemics.