Litcius/Paper detail

Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT

Nicola Rosa, Maddalena De Bernardo, Giulia Abbinante, Gianluca Vecchio, Ferdinando Cione, Luigi Capasso

2022Journal of Clinical Medicine34 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

This observational study compared optic coherence tomography (OCT) and B-scan in the detection of optic disc drusen. In total, 86 eyes of 50 patients with optic disc drusen (ODD) (36 bilateral) with a mean age of 34.68 ± 23.81 years, and 54 eyes of 27 patients with papilledema, with a mean age of 35.42 years ± 17.47, were examined. Patients with ODD, diagnosed with ultrasound, underwent spectral-domain OCT evaluation. With US, 28 ODD cases were classified as large (4 buried and 24 superficial), 58 were classified as point-like (6 buried, 49 superficial and 3 mixed). Then, all patients underwent OCT. OCT was able to detect the presence of ODD and/or peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass structure (PHOMS) in 69 eyes (p < 0.001). In particular, 7 eyes (8.14%) showed the presence of ODD alone, 25 eyes (29.07%) showed only PHOMS and 37 eyes (43.02%) showed ODD and PHOMS. In 17 eyes (19.77%) no ODD or PHOMS were detected. In the papilledema group, no ODD were observed with both US and OCT. OCT showed the presence of drusen or similar lesions in only 80.23% of the cases highlighted by the US scan, so it does not allow for certain ODD diagnoses, especially in the case of buried ODD.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineDrusenOphthalmologyPapilledemaOptical coherence tomographyOptic nerveUltrasoundRetinalRadiologyCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisGlaucoma and retinal disordersOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Optic Nerve Drusen Evaluation: A Comparison between Ultrasound and OCT | Litcius