Primary Autologous Osteochondral Transfer Shows Superior Long‐Term Outcome and Survival Rate Compared With Bone Marrow Stimulation for Large Cystic Osteochondral Lesion of Talus
Dong Woo Shim, Kwang Hwan Park, Jin Woo Lee, Yun-Jung Yang, Jucheol Shin, Seung Hwan Han
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the results of bone marrow stimulation (BMS) versus autologous osteochondral transfer (AOT) as primary surgical option for large cystic osteochondral lesion of talus (OLT) and to further distinguish factors associated with clinical failures and overall survival. METHODS: ) who underwent either primary BMS or AOT between January 2001 and January 2016 with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. Lesion surface area and volume were measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed using pain visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Survival outcomes and factors associated with clinical failures were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: , respectively. The primary AOT group showed significantly superior improvements in clinical outcomes compared with the BMS group at last follow-up (P = .001). Fourteen patients in the primary BMS group and 2 patients in the primary AOT group experienced clinical failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a superior survival rate of primary AOT (P = .042). Syndesmosis widening (hazard ratio 12.361; P = .004) and large lesion surface area (hazard ratio 1.011; P = .014) were significant relative risks of clinical failure in the primary BMS group. However, lesion volume showed no significant relationship with clinical failure. CONCLUSION: Long-term results of primary AOT showed superior clinical improvements and survival rate in treating large cystic OLT. Risk factors for failure in the primary BMS group were large lesion surface area and syndesmosis widening. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.