Litcius/Paper detail

Aspirin vs. clopidogrel monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial

Hirotoshi Watanabe, Masahiro Natsuaki, Takeshi Morimoto, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kenji Andò, Takenori Domei, Satoru Suwa, Manabu Ogita, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Hiroyuki Takenaka, Takashi Yamamoto, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Itaru Hisauchi, Kohei Wakabayashi, Y Onishi, Kiyoshi Hibi, Kazuya Kawai, Ruka Yoshida, Hiroshi Suzuki, Gaku Nakazawa, Takanori Kusuyama, Itsuro Morishima, Koh Ono, Takeshi Kimura

2024European Heart Journal37 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There was no previous trial comparing aspirin monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. METHODS: In the STOPDAPT-3, patients with acute coronary syndrome or high bleeding risk (HBR) were randomly assigned to either 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) or 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This secondary analysis compared aspirin monotherapy with clopidogrel monotherapy by the 30-day landmark analysis. The co-primary endpoints were the cardiovascular endpoint defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischaemic stroke and the bleeding endpoint defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5. RESULTS: Of the 6002 assigned patients, 5833 patients (aspirin group: N = 2920 and clopidogrel group: N = 2913) were included in the 30-day landmark analysis. Median age was 73 (interquartile range 64-80) years, women 23.4%, acute coronary syndrome 74.6%, and high bleeding risk 54.1%. The assigned monotherapy was continued at 1 year in 87.5% and 87.2% in the aspirin and clopidogrel groups, respectively. The incidence rates beyond 30 days and up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for both cardiovascular endpoint [4.5 and 4.5 per 100 person-year, hazard ratio 1.00 (95% confidence interval .77-1.30), P = .97], and bleeding endpoint [2.0 and 1.9, hazard ratio 1.02 (95% confidence interval .69-1.52), P = .92]. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin monotherapy compared with clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 1 month and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (STOPDAPT-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04609111).

Topics & Concepts

MedicineClopidogrelAspirinPrasugrelPercutaneous coronary interventionInternal medicineInterquartile rangeMyocardial infarctionHazard ratioAcute coronary syndromeClinical endpointCardiologyConventional PCIRandomized controlled trialConfidence intervalAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Aspirin vs. clopidogrel monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial | Litcius