Litcius/Paper detail

Assessment of Bottom Trawl Impacts on the Status of Seabed Communities in European Seas

Jan Geert Hiddink, Sebastian Valanko, Luke Batts, Esther Beukhof, Mats Blomqvist, Stefan G. Bolam, Belén Calero, Michele Casini, Marina Delgado, Jochen Depestele, Joanna Desmidt, G. Di Bona, Bianca Di Lorenzo, Grete E. Dinesen, Gianfranco D'Onghia, Josefine Egekvist, Emanuela Fanelli, M. Teresa Farriols, Gianluca Franceschini, Juan Gil, José Manuel González‐Irusta, Pascal Laffargue, Irida Maina, Porzia Maiorano, Renato Mamede, Maria Cristina Mangano, Alessandra Nguyen Xuan, Nadia Papadopoulou, Marina Penna, Andrea Pierucci, Marina Pulcini, Saša Raicevich, Arnold Rakaj, Sofia Reizopoulou, Giada Riva, Tommaso Russo, Antonello Sala, G Sarà, Alice Sbrana, Giuseppe Scarcella, Marija Sciberras, Mattias Sköld, Chris J. Smith, I. Sobrino, María Teresa Spedicato, Валентина Тодорова, Irini Tsikopoulou, Karin J. van der Reijden, Sandrine Vaz, Cristina Vina‐Herbon, Nedo Vrgoc, Katherine Wright, Wenyan Zhang, Walter Zupa, Gert Van Hoey, Ole Ritzau Eigaard, Tobias van Kooten, P. Daniël van Denderen

2026Fish and Fisheries8 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bottom trawling affects seabed habitats, but its large‐scale impacts remain poorly quantified. Assessment of trawling impacts is essential to support monitoring and achieving sustainability objectives under international conventions, sustainable development goals, and seafood certification programs. We present a Europe‐wide quantitative assessment of bottom trawling impacts, accounting for regional seabed‐community sensitivity drivers, across the Baltic, Atlantic, Mediterranean and Black Sea continental shelves. Using two risk‐based indicators of seabed status—Relative Benthic Status determined as benthic community biomass relative to seabed fauna carrying capacity (RBS tot ) and RBS sen (biomass of the 10% most sensitive fauna relative to carrying capacity)—we found substantial regional and habitat differences. The Black, Baltic and Aegean‐Levantine Seas showed low trawling intensity and high seabed status across habitats. In contrast, the Western Mediterranean, Ionian and Central Mediterranean and Adriatic Seas were the most severely impacted. Trawling affected the sensitive species biomass fraction more strongly than the total community biomass. RBS tot was in good condition (here chosen as RBS > 75% for epifauna) for over 79% of habitat‐ecoregion combinations. In contrast, RBS sen met this threshold in only 46% of these. A strong correlation emerged between the mean trawling intensity and RBS tot and RBS sen , allowing the use of SAR to estimate ecosystem status. This relationship can support decisions on where, and by how much, SAR reductions are needed to achieve good environmental status in regions where no detailed assessment is available. Our approach provides a quantitative framework to balance fishery production with ecosystem sustainability, offering tools for environmental and fisheries management in Europe.

Topics & Concepts

TrawlingBottom trawlingBenthic zoneFisheryEnvironmental scienceOceanographySeabedBiomass (ecology)SustainabilityFaunaEcosystemMediterranean climateDredgingBenthosMediterranean seaImpact assessmentHabitatEnvironmental impact assessmentMarine ecosystemDiscardsFishingBaseline (sea)Marine protected areaBycatchMarine and fisheries researchCoastal and Marine ManagementMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies