Litcius/Paper detail

Imperfect phase randomization and generalized decoy-state quantum key distribution

Shlok Nahar, Twesh Upadhyaya, Norbert Lütkenhaus

2023Physical Review Applied16 citationsDOI

Abstract

Decoy-state methods are essential to perform quantum key distribution (QKD) at large distances in the absence of single-photon sources. However, the standard techniques apply only if laser pulses are used that are independent and identically distributed. Moreover, they require that the laser pulses are fully phase randomized. However, realistic high-speed QKD setups do not meet these stringent requirements. In this work, we generalize decoy-state analysis to accommodate laser sources that emit imperfectly phase-randomized states. We also develop theoretical tools to prove the security of protocols with lasers that emit pulses that are independent, but not identically distributed. These tools can be used with recent work [G. Curr\'as-Lorenzo, S. Nahar, N. L\"utkenhaus, K. Tamaki, and M. Curty, Quantum Sci. Technol. (2023)] to prove the security of laser sources with correlated phase distributions as well. We quantitatively demonstrate the effect of imperfect phase randomization on key rates by computing the key rates for a simple implementation of the three-state protocol.

Topics & Concepts

Quantum key distributionComputer scienceLaserKey (lock)Independent and identically distributed random variablesImperfectPhase (matter)Pulse (music)State (computer science)Key generationProtocol (science)PhysicsPhotonAlgorithmQuantum mechanicsMathematicsTelecommunicationsComputer securityStatisticsCryptographyAlternative medicinePhilosophyMedicineRandom variablePathologyDetectorLinguisticsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Imperfect phase randomization and generalized decoy-state quantum key distribution | Litcius