Litcius/Paper detail

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults with Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea with versus without Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in the RICCADSA Clinical Trial

Christine zu Eulenburg, Yeliz Çelik, Susan Redline, Erik Thunström, Helena Glantz, Patrick J. Strollo, Yüksel Peker

2023Annals of the American Thoracic Society28 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Recent randomized controlled trials did not show cardiovascular benefits of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in adults with coronary artery disease (CAD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in intention-to-treat analyses. It has been argued that exclusion of patients with OSA with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), who may be most likely to benefit from CPAP treatment, may be a reason for the null results. Objectives We addressed 1) the effect of concomitant EDS on adverse outcomes in patients with CAD and OSA; and 2) whether the cardiovascular benefit of CPAP adherence differs between individuals with versus without EDS. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the RICCADSA (Randomized Intervention with CPAP in CAD and Obstructive Sleep Apnea) trial, conducted in Sweden between 2005 and 2013. Data were analyzed from 155 patients with CAD with OSA (apnea–hypopnea index ⩾ 15/h) and EDS (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ⩾ 10), who were allocated to CPAP and 244 patients without EDS (ESS < 10), who were randomized to CPAP or no CPAP. Patients who were allocated to no CPAP or were nonadherent (CPAP usage < 4 h/night) were compared with adherent patients (CPAP usage ⩾ 4 h/night) at 1-year follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to mimic randomization of EDS. The primary endpoint was the first event of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. Results The median follow-up was 52.2 months. The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the EDS versus no-EDS groups in the entire cohort. Within the adherent group, patients without EDS had a significantly decreased risk compared with patients with EDS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.85; P = 0.02). Conclusions Adverse cardiovascular outcomes did not differ by degrees of EDS for patients with CAD with OSA who were untreated or nonadherent to treatment. CPAP use, at least 4 h/night, was associated with reduced adverse outcomes in participants without EDS. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00519597).

Topics & Concepts

MedicineContinuous positive airway pressureObstructive sleep apneaEpworth Sleepiness ScaleCoronary artery diseaseRandomized controlled trialSleep apneaClinical endpointInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionApnea–hypopnea indexPolysomnographyExcessive daytime sleepinessStroke (engine)CardiologyPhysical therapyApneaSleep disorderEngineeringCognitionPsychiatryMechanical engineeringObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleepSleep and related disorders
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults with Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea with versus without Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in the RICCADSA Clinical Trial | Litcius