Litcius/Paper detail

Increased bundle‐sheath leakiness of <scp>CO<sub>2</sub></scp> during photosynthetic induction shows a lack of coordination between the <scp>C<sub>4</sub></scp> and <scp>C<sub>3</sub></scp> cycles

Yu Wang, Samantha S. Stutz, Carl J. Bernacchi, Ryan A. Boyd, Donald R. Ort, Stephen P. Long

2022New Phytologist30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Summary Use of a complete dynamic model of NADP‐malic enzyme C 4 photosynthesis indicated that, during transitions from dark or shade to high light, induction of the C 4 pathway was more rapid than that of C 3 , resulting in a predicted transient increase in bundle‐sheath CO 2 leakiness ( ϕ ). Previously, ϕ has been measured at steady state; here we developed a new method, coupling a tunable diode laser absorption spectroscope with a gas‐exchange system to track ϕ in sorghum and maize through the nonsteady‐state condition of photosynthetic induction. In both species, ϕ showed a transient increase to &gt; 0.35 before declining to a steady state of 0.2 by 1500 s after illumination. Average ϕ was 60% higher than at steady state over the first 600 s of induction and 30% higher over the first 1500 s. The transient increase in ϕ , which was consistent with model prediction, indicated that capacity to assimilate CO 2 into the C 3 cycle in the bundle sheath failed to keep pace with the rate of dicarboxylate delivery by the C 4 cycle. Because nonsteady‐state light conditions are the norm in field canopies, the results suggest that ϕ in these major crops in the field is significantly higher and energy conversion efficiency lower than previous measured values under steady‐state conditions.

Topics & Concepts

PhotosynthesisBundleSteady state (chemistry)ChemistryVascular bundleAnalytical Chemistry (journal)BotanyPhysicsBiologyMaterials scienceBiochemistryPhysical chemistryComposite materialChromatographyPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsPlant responses to elevated CO2