Effect of remimazolam <i>vs.</i> propofol on hemodynamics during general anesthesia induction in elderly patients: Single-center, randomized controlled trial
Mingfeng He, Chanjuan Gong, Yinan Chen, Rongting Chen, Yanning Qian
Abstract
The current study aimed to compare the effects between remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during the induction of general anesthesia in elderly patients. We used propofol at a rate of 60 mg/(kg·h) in the propofol group (group P) or remimazolam at a rate of 6 mg/(kg·h) in the remimazolam group (group R) for the induction. A processed electroencephalogram was used to determine whether the induction was successful and when to stop the infusion of the study drug. We measured when patients entered the operating room (T<sub>0</sub>), when the induction was successful (T<sub>1</sub>), and when before (T<sub>2</sub>) and 5 min after successful endotracheal intubation (T<sub>3</sub>). We found that mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower at T<sub>1–3</sub>, compared with T<sub>0</sub> in both groups, but higher at T<sub>2</sub> in the group R, while ΔMAP<sub>T0–T2</sub> and ΔMAP<sub>max</sub> were smaller in the group R (ΔMAP<sub>T0–T2</sub>: the difference between MAP at time point T<sub>0</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>, ΔMAP<sub>max</sub>: the difference between MAP at time point T<sub>0</sub> and the lowest value from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>3</sub>). Cardiac index and stroke volume index did not differ between groups, whereas systemic vascular resistance index was higher at T<sub>1–3</sub> in the group R. These findings show that remimazolam, compared with propofol, better maintains hemodynamic stability during the induction, which may be attributed to its ability to better maintain systemic vascular resistance levels.