Evaluation of Panbio rapid antigen test for SARS‐CoV‐2 in symptomatic patients and their contacts: a multicenter study
Ireri Thirión-Romero, Selene Guerrero‐Zúñiga, Alexandra Arias‐Mendoza, Dora Patricia Cornejo-Juárez, Patricia Meza-Meneses, Darwin Stalin Torres-Erazo, Thierry Hernández‐Gilsoul, Arturo Galindo‐Fraga, Maria Isabel Villegas-Mota, Jesús Sepúlveda-Delgado, Santiago Ávila‐Ríos, Eduardo Becerril‐Vargas, Rosario Fernández-Plata, TIT Midori Pérez-Kawabe, Ana Coeto-Cano, Joel Armando Vázquez-Pérez, Simón Kawa‐Karasik, Gustavo Reyes‐Terán, Dr. José Rogelio Pérez-Padilla
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care rapid tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 can have clinical benefits. METHODS: A cross-sectional study in adults visiting emergency services or screening sites of referral hospitals for COVID-19 to validate the diagnostic performance of a rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott's Panbio) compared with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Tests were performed by health personnel in a routine situation during a COVID-19 outbreak. RESULTS: A total of 1060 participants (mean age 47, 46% with a self-reported comorbidity) were recruited from 8 hospitals in Mexico. Participants provided 1060 valid Panbio rapid test-RT-PCR test pairs with 45% testing positive in the RT-PCR. Overall sensitivity of the Panbio test was 54.2% (95% CI 51%-57%), and 69.1% (95% CI 66%-73%) for patients during the first week of symptoms. Sensitivity depended on viral load (cycle threshold (Ct) of RT-PCR) and days of symptoms. With a Ct ≤25, sensitivity was 82% (95% CI, 76%-87%). Specificity of the Panbio test was >97.8% in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Panbio rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 had good specificity but low sensitivity. A negative test requires confirmation with RT-PCR, especially for testing after the first week of symptoms.