Race, Genetic Ancestry, and Estimating Kidney Function in CKD
Chi-yuan Hsu, Wei Yang, Rishi V. Parikh, Amanda H. Anderson, Teresa K. Chen, Debbie L. Cohen, Jiang He, Madhumita J. Mohanty, James P. Lash, Katherine T. Mills, Anthony N. Muiru, Afshin Parsa, Milda R. Saunders, Tariq Shafi, Raymond R. Townsend, Sushrut S. Waikar, Jianqiao Wang, Myles Wolf, Thida C. Tan, Harold I. Feldman, Alan S. Go
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The inclusion of race in equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has become controversial. Alternative equations that can be used to achieve similar accuracy without the use of race are needed. METHODS: In a large national study involving adults with chronic kidney disease, we conducted cross-sectional analyses of baseline data from 1248 participants for whom data, including the following, had been collected: race as reported by the participant, genetic ancestry markers, and the serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, and 24-hour urinary creatinine levels. RESULTS: , 41%; 95% CI, 34 to 49) estimates in Black participants when GFR was estimated with the use of cystatin C. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the serum creatinine level to estimate the GFR without race (or genetic ancestry) introduced systematic misclassification that could not be eliminated even when numerous non-GFR determinants of the serum creatinine level were accounted for. The estimation of GFR with the use of cystatin C generated similar results while eliminating the negative consequences of the current race-based approaches. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others.).