Litcius/Paper detail

Cost thresholds for anticipated long‐acting HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis products in Eastern and Southern Africa: a mathematical modelling study

David Kaftan, Monisha Sharma, Danielle Resar, Masabho Milali, Edinah Mudimu, Linxuan Wu, Cory Arrouzet, Ingrida Platais, Hae‐Young Kim, Sarah Yardly Jenkins, Anna Bershteyn

2025Journal of the International AIDS Society11 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Affordable HIV prevention tools are needed in Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA). Several promising long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) products are available or in development. However, ESA settings face severe healthcare resource constraints. We aimed to estimate the threshold price at which LA-PrEP products could be cost-effective in three ESA settings. METHODS: We adapted an agent-based model, EMOD-HIV, to simulate LA-PrEP (monthly oral, 2- and 6-monthly injectable) rollout in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Kenya. Due to uncertainties about LA-PrEP use, we examined a range of coverages (5%-20% of HIV-negative sexually active adults) and extents to which LA-PrEP use will be concentrated among those most at risk (prioritized rollout from higher- to lower-risk groups vs. uniform rollout among sexually active adults). To evaluate a 20-year commitment to LA-PrEP delivery, we assumed LA-PrEP was scaled up to target coverage from 2025 to 2030 and maintained at target levels before ending in 2045. We estimated maximum per-dose and per-year LA-PrEP costs that achieve cost-effectiveness (<US$500 per disability-adjusted life-year averted) over 35 years (until 2060), compared to a scenario of daily oral PrEP only. Sensitivity analyses varied PrEP scale-up speeds and eligible populations. RESULTS: Risk-prioritized LA-PrEP for 5% of adults was projected to avert 11-21% of HIV acquisitions across settings, with 3-5 times more HIV acquisitions averted and 3-5 times higher maximum cost compared to non-prioritized rollout. Six-monthly injectable PrEP supported the highest per-dose cost: in the scenario with the most cost-effective LA-PrEP use (5% risk-prioritized rollout), the maximum per-dose price in South Africa was $52.99 (95% CI: $48.82-$57.21), in Zimbabwe $14.64 (95% CI: $12.04-$17.38) and in western Kenya $7.50 (95% CI: $6.73-$8.27). For monthly oral PrEP, corresponding per-dose costs were $5.02 (95% CI: $4.67-$5.37), $1.45 (95% CI: $1.10-$1.79) and $0.87 (95% CI: $0.80-$0.93). Results were sensitive to eligible population and prioritization, and moderately sensitive to scale-up speed and product effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: LA-PrEP is likely to require reduced pricing and/or risk-prioritized rollout to be cost-effective in ESA.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Pre-exposure prophylaxisEnvironmental healthIntensive care medicineVirologyMen who have sex with menSyphilisHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthSex work and related issues
Cost thresholds for anticipated long‐acting HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis products in Eastern and Southern Africa: a mathematical modelling study | Litcius