Impact of PI-QUAL on PI-RADS and cancer yield in an MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy population
Nina Pötsch, Eva Rainer, Paola Clauser, Giulia Vatteroni, Nicolai Huebner, Stephan Korn, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Thomas H. Helbich, Pascal Baltzer
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test the inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for multiparametric prostate MRI and its impact on diagnostic performance in an MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pre-biopsy multiparametric (T2-weighted, DWI, and DCE) prostate MRIs (mpMRI) of 50 patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided MRI-fusion (MRI-TRUS) biopsy were included. Two radiologists independently assigned a PI-QUAL score to each patient and assessed the diagnostic quality of individual sequences. PI-RADS categories were assigned to six regions per prostate (left and right: base/mid-glandular/apex). Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa and diagnostic performance was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS: In 274 diagnostic areas, the malignancy rate was 62.7% (22.5% clinically significant prostate cancer, ISUP ≥ 2). Inter-reader agreement for the diagnostic quality was poor for T2w (kappa 0.19), fair for DWI and DCE (kappa 0.23 and 0.29) and moderate for PI-QUAL (kappa 0.51). For PI-RADS category assignments, inter-reader agreement was very good (kappa 0.86). Overall diagnostic performance did not differ between studies with a PI-QUAL score > 3 compared to a score ≤ 3 (p = 0.552; AUC 0.805 and 0.839). However, the prevalence of prostate cancer was significantly lower when the PI-QUAL score was ≤ 3 (16.7% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: PI-QUAL has only a limited impact on PI-RADS diagnostic performance in patients scheduled for MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy. However, the lower cancer prevalence in the lower PI-QUAL categories points out a risk of false-positive referrals and unnecessary biopsies if prostate imaging quality is low.