“What’s Worth Doing?”: A Qualitative Historical Analysis of the TPSR Model
K. Andrew R. Richards, Victoria N. Shiver
Abstract
Purpose : The authors sought to trace the development of the teaching personal and social responsibility (TPSR) model from its initial conception by Don Hellison as a humanistic approach to teaching physical education to the current version of the model through qualitative historiography. Methods : Data sources included: (a) books written by Don, (b) sources that discussed the evolution of the model, and (c) supplemental texts that are important to the TPSR literature. Results : The authors identified four phases of TPSR model development: (a) setting the stage for a humanistic approach through practical inquiry, (b) moving beyond balls and bats to developing a model focused on the affective domain, (c) further defining humanistic goals and teaching strategies, and (d) continuous tinkering in the context of a living model. Discussion/Conclusions : Lessons learned about the model are discussed in relation to practical inquiry, and recommendations are made related to the future of the TPSR model.