Comparison of <scp>MRI</scp> and <scp>CT</scp> for the Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on a <scp>Non‐Radiomics</scp> and Radiomics Method: Which Imaging Modality Is Better?
Xiangpan Meng, Yuancheng Wang, Jiaying Zhou, Yu Qian, Chun‐Qiang Lu, Cong Xia, Tianyu Tang, Jiajia Xu, Ke Sun, Wenbo Xiao, Shenghong Ju
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are both capable of predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, which modality is better is unknown. PURPOSE: To intraindividually compare CT and MRI for predicting MVI in solitary HCC and investigate the added value of radiomics analyses. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Included were 402 consecutive patients with HCC (training set:validation set = 300:102). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging MRI at 3.0T and contrast-enhanced CT. ASSESSMENT: CT- and MR-based radiomics signatures (RS) were constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. CT- and MR-based radiologic (R) and radiologic-radiomics (RR) models were developed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The performance of the RS/models was compared between two modalities. To investigate the added value of RS, the performance of the R models was compared with the RR models in HCC of all sizes and 2-5 cm in size. STATISTICAL TESTS: Model performance was quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using the Delong test. RESULTS: Histopathologic MVI was identified in 161 patients (training set:validation set = 130:31). MRI-based RS/models tended to have a marginally higher AUC than CT-based RS/models (AUCs of CT vs. MRI, P: RS, 0.801 vs. 0.804, 0.96; R model, 0.809 vs. 0.832, 0.09; RR model, 0.835 vs. 0.872, 0.54). The improvement of RR models over R models in all sizes was not significant (P = 0.21 at CT and 0.09 at MRI), whereas the improvement in 2-5 cm was significant at MRI (P < 0.05) but not at CT (P = 0.16). DATA CONCLUSION: CT and MRI had a comparable predictive performance for MVI in solitary HCC. The RS of MRI only had significant added value for predicting MVI in HCC of 2-5 cm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.