Litcius/Paper detail

Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements

Jacquelien J Hillebrand, Wjera V. Wickenhagen, Annemieke C. Heijboer

2020The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism29 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Despite all the effort taken, there is often surprisingly little attention paid to the hormone analyses involved in research studies. Thinking carefully about the quality of the hormone measurements in these studies is, however, of major importance, as this attention to methods may prevent false conclusions and inappropriate follow-up studies. We discuss issues regarding hormone measurements that one should consider, ideally prior to starting, or otherwise, as they arise during a scientific study: quality of the technique, expertise, matrices, timing and storage conditions, freeze-thaw cycles, lot-to-lot and day-to-day variation, analyses per batch or sample-wise, singlicate or duplicate measurements, combining methods, and standardization. This article and the examples mentioned herein aim to clarify the need to pay attention to the hormone analyses, and to help in making decisions. In addition, these examples help editors and reviewers of scientific journals to pay attention to the methods section in the submitted manuscripts and ask the right critical questions when needed.

Topics & Concepts

StandardizationQuality (philosophy)Ask priceSample (material)Computer sciencePsychologyData scienceEpistemologyBusinessChemistryFinanceOperating systemChromatographyPhilosophyEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsHormonal and reproductive studiesMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements | Litcius