Litcius/Paper detail

Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets

Kateřina Polášková, Alp Özkan, Miloš Klíma, Zdeňka Jeníková, Madhuwanthi Buddhadasa, François Reniers, Lenka Zajı́čková

2023Plasma Processes and Polymers11 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Plasma treatment of polypropylene (PP) is a well‐established method of improving its surface properties. However, the efficiencies of different plasma discharges are seldom compared. Herein, we discuss the differences in PP treated by three arc‐based commercial plasma jets working in dry air, Plasmatreat rotating plasma jet (PT‐RPJ), AFS PlasmaJet® (AFS‐PJ), and SurfaceTreat gliding arc jet (ST‐GA), and by the low‐temperature RF plasma slit jet (RF‐PSJ) working in argon. The AFS‐PJ has a significantly different reactive species composition dominated by nitrogen oxides. It induced higher thermal loads leading to surface damage. The other arc‐based jets (PT‐RPJ and ST‐GA) created the PP surface with higher oxygen and nitrogen concentration than the low‐temperature RF‐PSJ. It induced a higher adhesion strength measured on PP‐aluminum joints.

Topics & Concepts

PlasmaPolypropyleneJet (fluid)Materials scienceArgonNitrogenAtmospheric-pressure plasmaPlasma torchAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Plasma arc weldingAluminiumElectric arcArc (geometry)Atmospheric pressureComposite materialAtomic physicsChemistryPhysicsMechanicsElectrodeEnvironmental chemistryNuclear physicsMeteorologyGeometryPhysical chemistryWeldingMathematicsOrganic chemistrySurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets | Litcius