Efficacy and safety of 0.15% isobutylamido thiazolyl resorcinol combined with hyaluronic acid vs 0.15% isobutylamido thiazolyl resorcinol or hyaluronic acid alone in melasma treatment: A randomized evaluator‐blind trial
Wareeporn Disphanurat, Benjaporn Srisantithum
Abstract
Abstract Background Melasma has a complex pathogenesis, and various aggravating factors contribute to its recalcitrance to treatments. A combination of isobutylamido thiazolyl resorcinol (ITR) and hyaluronic acid (HA) could increase melasma treatment efficacy. Aims To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.15% ITR plus HA vs 0.15% ITR or HA alone in melasma treatment. Methods Ninety‐two patients received ITR 0.15% plus HA ( n = 30), 0.15% ITR ( n = 31), or HA ( n = 31) along with broad‐spectrum sunscreen application for 12 weeks. Treatment efficacy was determined using modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI), average melanin and melanin variation with Antera3D ® , and safety based on transepidermal water loss. Results Compared with the HA group, the ITR+HA group showed significantly reduced mMASI at weeks 4, 8, and 12 ( p = 0.026, 0.015, and 0.001, respectively), whereas the ITR group showed a significant reduction at week 12 ( p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the mMASI or average melanin level between the ITR+HA and ITR groups. Melanin variation was significantly lower in the ITR+HA group than in the ITR group at weeks 4, 8, and 12 ( p = 0.027, 0.019, and 0.023, respectively). Conclusions The combination of 0.15% ITR and 0.15% ITR+HA effectively reduced melasma severity. HA could synergistically improve melasma homogeneity.