Litcius/Paper detail

Large language models: a new frontier in paediatric cataract patient education

Qais A. Dihan, Muhammad Z. Chauhan, Taher K. Eleiwa, Andrew D. Brown, Amr K. Hassan, Mohamed M. Khodeiry, Reem H. ElSheikh, Isdin Oke, Bharti R. Nihalani, Deborah K. VanderVeen, Ahmed B. Sallam, Abdelrahman M. Elhusseiny

2024British Journal of Ophthalmology29 citationsDOI

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This was a cross-sectional comparative study. We evaluated the ability of three large language models (LLMs) (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard) to generate novel patient education materials (PEMs) and improve the readability of existing PEMs on paediatric cataract. METHODS: We compared LLMs' responses to three prompts. Prompt A requested they write a handout on paediatric cataract that was 'easily understandable by an average American.' Prompt B modified prompt A and requested the handout be written at a 'sixth-grade reading level, using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula.' Prompt C rewrote existing PEMs on paediatric cataract 'to a sixth-grade reading level using the SMOG readability formula'. Responses were compared on their quality (DISCERN; 1 (low quality) to 5 (high quality)), understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (≥70%: understandable, ≥70%: actionable)), accuracy (Likert misinformation; 1 (no misinformation) to 5 (high misinformation) and readability (SMOG, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL); grade level <7: highly readable). RESULTS: All LLM-generated responses were of high-quality (median DISCERN ≥4), understandability (≥70%), and accuracy (Likert=1). All LLM-generated responses were not actionable (<70%). ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 prompt B responses were more readable than prompt A responses (p<0.001). ChatGPT-4 generated more readable responses (lower SMOG and FKGL scores; 5.59±0.5 and 4.31±0.7, respectively) than the other two LLMs (p<0.001) and consistently rewrote them to or below the specified sixth-grade reading level (SMOG: 5.14±0.3). CONCLUSION: LLMs, particularly ChatGPT-4, proved valuable in generating high-quality, readable, accurate PEMs and in improving the readability of existing materials on paediatric cataract.

Topics & Concepts

ReadabilityMisinformationMedicineReading (process)Grade levelLikert scaleComprehensionQuality (philosophy)Patient educationFamily medicineMedical educationMathematics educationComputer sciencePsychologyComputer securityLawEpistemologyDevelopmental psychologyPhilosophyProgramming languagePolitical scienceHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationGenomics and Rare Diseases