Litcius/Paper detail

How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales

Kim Cocks, Jacqueline Buchanan

2022Quality of Life Research17 citationsDOI

Topics & Concepts

Quality of Life ResearchScale (ratio)UsabilityPsychologyCognitionRating scaleClinical psychologyPatient-reported outcomePhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)MedicinePublic healthDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryPsychotherapistComputer scienceNursingPhysicsQuantum mechanicsHuman–computer interactionCancer survivorship and careIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersNausea and vomiting management
How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales | Litcius