Water reuse and resource recovery from greenhouse wastewater by capacitive electrodialysis at pilot scale
Tavishi Guleria, Joep van den Broeke, Ides Platteau, Timon Rijnaarts, A. Alhadidi, Leonardo Gutiérrez, Emile Cornelissen
Abstract
As food production dominates global freshwater consumption and nutrient discharge regulation tightens, the performance of novel technologies at applied scale needs to be studied to optimize water use and minimize environmental impact. Water reuse and the nutrient recovery from greenhouse wastewater were assessed utilizing one-pass capacitive electrodialysis (CED) at a pilot scale (19.32 m 2 membrane area, 1–4 m 3 /day capacity), employing carbon-based electrodes. CED was optimized for key parameters, including applied voltage, cross-flow velocity, staging, water recovery, and varying feed concentrations. High-quality greenhouse irrigation water (conductivity<0.2 mS/cm and Na + < 0.1 mmol/L) was produced, meeting specified guidelines. Na + was retained less compared to Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ (86 % ± 4 %, 97 % ± 2 %, and 98 % ± 3 % removal, respectively) and nutrients concentration factors for K + , NO 3 − and PO 4 3− reached up to 2.3 (596 ± 5 mg/L), 2.7 (1330 ± 20 mg/L), and 1.9 (130 ± 2 mg/L), respectively. There was no significant improvement in ion removal for all feed compositions beyond 12 V and 80 % water recovery. CED's specific energy consumption (SEC) with optimized parameters was 4-fold lower than the modeled RO system, and lower than previous electrodialysis studies. The highest SEC obtained was 0.24 kWh/m 3 . These findings suggest that CED is a promising technology for the greenhouse horticulture sector, aiding the move toward zero liquid discharge. • Pilot-scale CED is efficient for resource recovery from greenhouse wastewater. • Irrigation water with conductivity <0.2 mS/cm and Na + < 0.1 mmol/L was achieved. • Optimal operation at 12 V, 80 % recovery, 5.12 cm/s flow velocity and 2-stack staging. • Nutrient showed concentration factors of K + (2.3), NO 3 − (2.7), and PO 4 3− (1.9). • CED's energy consumption was 4-fold lower than RO.