Litcius/Paper detail

Prognostic value of tumor deposits in rectal cancer: A monocentric series of 505 patients

Olivier Benoit, Magali Svrcek, Ben Creavin, Morgane Bouquot, Alexandre Challine, Najim Chafaı̈, Clotilde Debove, Thibault Voron, Yann Parc, Jérémie H. Lefèvre

2020Journal of Surgical Oncology23 citationsDOI

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that tumor deposits (TDs) may have a worse prognosis in rectal cancer compared with colonic cancer. The aim of this study was to assess TDs prognosis in rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent total mesorectum excision for rectal adenocarcinoma (2011-2016) were included. A case-matched analysis was performed to assess the accurate impact of TDs for each pN category after exclusion of synchronous metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 505 patients were included. TDs were observed in 99 (19.6%) patients, (pN1c = 37 [7.3%]). TDs were associated with pT3-T4 stage (P = .037), synchronous metastasis (P = .003), lymph node (LN) invasion (P = .041), vascular invasion (P = .001), and perineural invasion (P < .001). TD was associated with a worse 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) among pN0 (51.2% vs 79.8%; P < .001); pN1 patients (35.2% vs 70.1%; P = .004) but not among pN2 patients (37.5% vs 44.7%; P = .499). After matching, pN1c patients had a worse 3-year DFS compared with pN0 patients (58.6% vs 82.4%; P = .035) and a tendency toward a worse DFS among N1 patients (40.1% vs 64.2%; P = .153). DFS was worse when one TD was compared with one invaded LN (40.8% vs 81.3%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In rectal cancer, TDs have a metastatic risk comparable to a pN2 stage which may lead to changes in adjuvant treatment.

Topics & Concepts

MedicinePerineural invasionColorectal cancerStage (stratigraphy)Internal medicineMesorectumLymph node metastasisGastroenterologyCancerLymph nodeAdenocarcinomaMetastasisTotal mesorectal excisionPaleontologyBiologyColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsColorectal and Anal CarcinomasEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment