A Systematic Review Through Intellectual Based Blockchain-Intermediary
Kartini, Sugeng Santoso, Eka Purnama Harahap, Alfiah Khoirunisa, Kenita Zelina
Abstract
Decentralized ecosystems are generally still rarely used in various disciplines. Of all the existing fields, decentralization is only applying to solve problems requiring various partners' organizing. Blockchain has unique characteristics and reflects multiple values related to distinctive and prevalent influences is often referred to by the online community as crypto. This study describes Blockchain-mediated decentralization based on a systematic review on decentralization. This review covers the features of decentralization in a variety of disciplines starting with public administration to science. Blockchain as an intermediary referred to in various scientific articles as an opponent of the binary position interpreted, decentralized and centralized. The author proposes a dialectical design and argues that system jurisdiction allotment is a standard located on the scale amongst pure or centralized decentralization and then notes how a Blockchain arrangement can simultaneously have entities that are significantly centralized whereas others are not. Through a systematic review, we offer a design of Blockchain-mediated decentralization comprehension by having the authors document the findings based on their systematic review. Their proposed framework for generating Blockchain-mediated decentralization comprehension recommends a description and then drawing a new direction for future research on humans into distributed ledger technology.