Litcius/Paper detail

Prioritising resilience policies to reduce welfare losses from natural disasters: A case study for coastal Bangladesh

Jasper Verschuur, Elco Koks, Bazle Z. Haque, Jim W. Hall

2020Global Environmental Change63 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Quantified flood risk assessments focus on asset losses, neglecting longer-term impacts to household welfare via income and consumption losses. The extent of welfare losses depends upon resilience – the ability to anticipate, resist, cope, recover and learn from a shock. Here, we use a novel welfare loss modelling framework and perform a high-resolution spatial analysis in coastal Bangladesh to quantify welfare losses from a tropical cyclone under present and future climatic and socio-economic conditions. We further test various adaptation options that are intended to enhance resilience. Results show that poor households experience, on average, 7% of the asset losses, but 42% of the welfare losses. Combining dike heightening, post-disaster support and stronger housing can reduce welfare losses by up to 70%, and foster sustainable development by benefitting the poor, increasing resilience and demonstrating robustness under socio-economic and climatic uncertainties. Thus, a welfare-orientated perspective helps to identify adaptation options that enhance resilience and leave no-one behind.

Topics & Concepts

WelfareNatural disasterFlood mythAsset (computer security)Shock (circulatory)Natural resource economicsPsychological resilienceResilience (materials science)Climate changeEnvironmental resource managementEconomicsBusinessGeographyComputer scienceComputer securityPsychologyEcologyMarket economyArchaeologyMedicinePhysicsThermodynamicsInternal medicineBiologyPsychotherapistMeteorologyFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementDisaster Management and ResilienceTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Prioritising resilience policies to reduce welfare losses from natural disasters: A case study for coastal Bangladesh | Litcius